Discussion:
robowiki are down now
a***@gmail.com
2013-12-27 04:39:35 UTC
Permalink
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Patrick Cupka
2013-12-27 15:54:59 UTC
Permalink
Sorry guys - We're aware of it and contacted David Alves who runs the VPS. He's probably busy with holiday stuff. Sorry for the downtime!

-- Patrick

Sent from my iPhone
Post by a***@gmail.com
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Dennis Ruiz
2014-01-02 23:39:47 UTC
Permalink
Oh my... Still down :(
Post by Patrick Cupka
Sorry guys - We're aware of it and contacted David Alves who runs the VPS.
He's probably busy with holiday stuff. Sorry for the downtime!
-- Patrick
Sent from my iPhone
Post by a***@gmail.com
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
Post by a***@gmail.com
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
m***@gmail.com
2014-01-04 17:33:25 UTC
Permalink
At least someone is looking after it. It would be a pity if the Robocode
communitty lose Robowiki for good.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Sorry guys - We're aware of it and contacted David Alves who runs the VPS.
He's probably busy with holiday stuff. Sorry for the downtime!
-- Patrick
Sent from my iPhone
Post by a***@gmail.com
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
Post by a***@gmail.com
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Patrick Cupka
2014-01-08 02:48:13 UTC
Permalink
Everything's back up. Really sorry about the downtime.
Post by m***@gmail.com
At least someone is looking after it. It would be a pity if the Robocode
communitty lose Robowiki for good.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Sorry guys - We're aware of it and contacted David Alves who runs the VPS.
He's probably busy with holiday stuff. Sorry for the downtime!
-- Patrick
Sent from my iPhone
Post by a***@gmail.com
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Patrick Cupka, ***@gmail.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
a***@gmail.com
2014-03-21 13:56:52 UTC
Permalink
HI. . . My son and I are going to begin a Robocode journey together. It
looks awesome! However, the robowiki.net is down. Could some please
contact the maintainer?

<Loading Image...>
-- Andy
Post by Patrick Cupka
Everything's back up. Really sorry about the downtime.
Post by m***@gmail.com
At least someone is looking after it. It would be a pity if the Robocode
communitty lose Robowiki for good.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Sorry guys - We're aware of it and contacted David Alves who runs the
VPS.
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by Patrick Cupka
He's probably busy with holiday stuff. Sorry for the downtime!
-- Patrick
Sent from my iPhone
Post by a***@gmail.com
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by a***@gmail.com
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Post by m***@gmail.com
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
Post by m***@gmail.com
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
d***@gmail.com
2014-06-09 00:20:12 UTC
Permalink
It's down today as well... is this a common thing ie dropping from time to
time or is it down for the long term?
Post by a***@gmail.com
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
fnl
2014-06-09 22:50:26 UTC
Permalink
It has been down for some days, which is not normal. I hope it will be up
again soon.

In the meanwhile, you can use the Wayback Machine to at least read articles
on the RoboWiki:
http://web.archive.org/web/20140429050838/http://www.robowiki.net/

Cheers,
- Flemming
Post by d***@gmail.com
It's down today as well... is this a common thing ie dropping from time to
time or is it down for the long term?
Post by a***@gmail.com
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
p***@gmail.com
2015-03-06 16:29:00 UTC
Permalink
Is the robowiki down for good?

Greg
Post by fnl
It has been down for some days, which is not normal. I hope it will be up
again soon.
In the meanwhile, you can use the Wayback Machine to at least read
http://web.archive.org/web/20140429050838/http://www.robowiki.net/
Cheers,
- Flemming
Post by d***@gmail.com
It's down today as well... is this a common thing ie dropping from time
to time or is it down for the long term?
Post by a***@gmail.com
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
fnl
2015-03-09 22:03:47 UTC
Permalink
RoboWiki is up and running again! :-)

- Flemming
Post by p***@gmail.com
Is the robowiki down for good?
Greg
Post by fnl
It has been down for some days, which is not normal. I hope it will be up
again soon.
In the meanwhile, you can use the Wayback Machine to at least read
http://web.archive.org/web/20140429050838/http://www.robowiki.net/
Cheers,
- Flemming
Post by d***@gmail.com
It's down today as well... is this a common thing ie dropping from time
to time or is it down for the long term?
Post by a***@gmail.com
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
v***@gmail.com
2015-03-18 18:38:26 UTC
Permalink
It is down again, and link to repository also.
Post by fnl
RoboWiki is up and running again! :-)
- Flemming
Post by p***@gmail.com
Is the robowiki down for good?
Greg
Post by fnl
It has been down for some days, which is not normal. I hope it will be
up again soon.
In the meanwhile, you can use the Wayback Machine to at least read
http://web.archive.org/web/20140429050838/http://www.robowiki.net/
Cheers,
- Flemming
Post by d***@gmail.com
It's down today as well... is this a common thing ie dropping from time
to time or is it down for the long term?
Post by a***@gmail.com
Anybody knows, who controls it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
s***@gmail.com
2015-03-19 22:02:33 UTC
Permalink
Does anyone know when it will be back up?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
fnl
2015-03-20 20:45:26 UTC
Permalink
It is up and running again. :-)
Post by s***@gmail.com
Does anyone know when it will be back up?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
David P. Caldwell
2015-03-21 01:52:36 UTC
Permalink
Looks like http://www.robocoderepository.com/ is still down, however.
Post by fnl
It is up and running again. :-)
Post by s***@gmail.com
Does anyone know when it will be back up?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
r***@gmail.com
2015-03-29 21:38:49 UTC
Permalink
Would be nice if there was a way of downloading RoboWiki (like you can do
with wikipedia), to ensure that it lives on and to have a fallback if it
goes down again. The archive.org doesn't crawl it very often.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Patrick Cupka
2015-03-29 23:41:42 UTC
Permalink
Yeah, that's a great idea! It's pretty frustrating when it goes down, since those of us that run it have mostly moved on to later stages of life. :-) I'll try to have a look soon, if nobody else gets to it first.

-- Patrick

Sent from mobile
Would be nice if there was a way of downloading RoboWiki (like you can do with wikipedia), to ensure that it lives on and to have a fallback if it goes down again. The archive.org doesn't crawl it very often.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
j***@gmail.com
2015-04-21 20:41:42 UTC
Permalink
It appears the site is still down... Any update by anyone?
Post by Patrick Cupka
Yeah, that's a great idea! It's pretty frustrating when it goes down,
since those of us that run it have mostly moved on to later stages of life.
:-) I'll try to have a look soon, if nobody else gets to it first.
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
Would be nice if there was a way of downloading RoboWiki (like you can do
with wikipedia), to ensure that it lives on and to have a fallback if it
goes down again. The archive.org doesn't crawl it very often.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
i***@gmail.com
2015-05-03 09:48:29 UTC
Permalink
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Pavel Šavara
2015-05-03 18:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Hi everybody,

it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is important
would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and run
it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?

Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !

Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
ramn.se ‘¸
2015-05-03 21:57:01 UTC
Permalink
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and run
it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Jesse Clark
2015-05-04 20:32:12 UTC
Permalink
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?

Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely used,
supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking to
work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
a***@gmail.com
2015-05-06 01:05:58 UTC
Permalink
Here's the most recent snapshot from the Wayback
Machine: http://web.archive.org/web/20150117105228/http://robowiki.net/
Post by Jesse Clark
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Mike Oliver
2015-05-07 23:41:39 UTC
Permalink
Its back!!! Thank you to whomever fixed robowiki
Post by a***@gmail.com
http://web.archive.org/web/20150117105228/http://robowiki.net/
Post by Jesse Clark
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide
some other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how
would one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
ramn.se ‘¸
2015-05-07 20:44:58 UTC
Permalink
Jesse, I believe robocode is viable. Another option might be
http://scalatron.github.io/
Post by Jesse Clark
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
l***@ualberta.ca
2016-11-04 05:38:35 UTC
Permalink
Hi I think the Wiki is down again. Do you know who is maintaining it? I'm
trying to learn more for a course project.
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Jesse, I believe robocode is viable. Another option might be
http://scalatron.github.io/
Post by Jesse Clark
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide
some other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how
would one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Patrick Cupka
2016-11-07 01:18:38 UTC
Permalink
Just checked on the wiki and it's back up and running again. Seems like the
machine rebooted but MySQL had to be kicked back on manually.

The main folks in charge of the wiki are me (Voidious) and David Alves, who
actually owns the hosting (and pays for it). Skilgannon and Rednaxela also
have SSH / sudo access. Usually one of us is around to kick the tires if
someone posts here or on Twitter. Sorry this took so long! I was out of
town since Friday.
Post by l***@ualberta.ca
Hi I think the Wiki is down again. Do you know who is maintaining it? I'm
trying to learn more for a course project.
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Jesse, I believe robocode is viable. Another option might be
http://scalatron.github.io/
Post by Jesse Clark
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide
some other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how
would one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/to
pic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Patrick Cupka, ***@gmail.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
d***@gmail.com
2016-11-14 17:00:22 UTC
Permalink
The wiki appears to be back down again. I'd like to use it to help my
students with a project. Is there any chance someone could bring it back
up? I'm going to contact you via Twitter as well. I hope that's ok.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Just checked on the wiki and it's back up and running again. Seems like
the machine rebooted but MySQL had to be kicked back on manually.
The main folks in charge of the wiki are me (Voidious) and David Alves,
who actually owns the hosting (and pays for it). Skilgannon and Rednaxela
also have SSH / sudo access. Usually one of us is around to kick the tires
if someone posts here or on Twitter. Sorry this took so long! I was out of
town since Friday.
Post by l***@ualberta.ca
Hi I think the Wiki is down again. Do you know who is maintaining it? I'm
trying to learn more for a course project.
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Jesse, I believe robocode is viable. Another option might be
http://scalatron.github.io/
Post by Jesse Clark
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done
though since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide
some other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how
would one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize
and run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Patrick Cupka
2016-11-15 23:59:56 UTC
Permalink
Wow, long delay in this email getting delivered... FYI Doug also contacted
me on Twitter about this yesterday and it has been resolved.
Post by d***@gmail.com
The wiki appears to be back down again. I'd like to use it to help my
students with a project. Is there any chance someone could bring it back
up? I'm going to contact you via Twitter as well. I hope that's ok.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Just checked on the wiki and it's back up and running again. Seems like
the machine rebooted but MySQL had to be kicked back on manually.
The main folks in charge of the wiki are me (Voidious) and David Alves,
who actually owns the hosting (and pays for it). Skilgannon and Rednaxela
also have SSH / sudo access. Usually one of us is around to kick the tires
if someone posts here or on Twitter. Sorry this took so long! I was out of
town since Friday.
Post by l***@ualberta.ca
Hi I think the Wiki is down again. Do you know who is maintaining it?
I'm trying to learn more for a course project.
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Jesse, I believe robocode is viable. Another option might be
http://scalatron.github.io/
Post by Jesse Clark
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done
though since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide
some other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how
would one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize
and run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/to
pic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Patrick Cupka, ***@gmail.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Patrick Cupka
2015-07-18 18:04:18 UTC
Permalink
Hey guys - late to the dialogue, but a few things to mention. (Beware: wall of text incoming.)

The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns" the wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting, actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it, there are plenty of other things that take precedence.

I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we could try.

There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode knowledge.

There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the "Google Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from IBM, it smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as communities of their own.

I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a comparison to Robocode gameplay here: http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like). It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in multithreading, (optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can beat Sanic (from Frohman).

The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the only truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.

I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;) At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2" will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.

Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,

-- Patrick

Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though since I've never done this before. Would a service such as http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Mike Oliver
2015-07-18 18:16:20 UTC
Permalink
Thanks for the update Patrick,
As a new person to Robocode it is apparent that there isn't a lot of active
community left, except for this google group, which is a shame.

For me Robocode gives an opportunity to improve my Java programming in a
fun and interesting way. It would be more enjoyable if we did have a more
active community(robowiki/google groups) with access to bots
(robocoderepository), but I can understand why since innovation reached its
peak in the early 2000's. What I don't understand is why the game itself
wasn't expanded. You could do a lot to alter the game but still keep the
feel. Incorporate 3D, varried terrain heights, obstacles, secondary weapon
types. There is a lot that could be added.

Anyway, my $0.02. I still enjoy working away on my robot, even if it will
never be a perfect wavesurfer
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns"
the wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the
"Google Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from
IBM, it smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the
only truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Patrick Cupka
2015-07-18 23:46:03 UTC
Permalink
2000's. What I don't understand is why the game itself wasn't expanded.
You could do a lot to alter the game but still keep the feel. Incorporate
3D, varried terrain heights, obstacles, secondary weapon types. There is a
lot that could be added.
One big reason is that ANY change at all to the gameplay would break
existing bots. (Even subtle changes have broken bots along the way.)
Robocode would be like every other game in the genre: modern gameplay
and nobody playing it. :-) Stuff like terrain, obstacles, and new
weapons belong in a new game. And those things ARE in other/new games
- games which very few Robocoders even care to try.

There have been expansions to the gameplay, though. Some links:
* ~2009, Joshua Gilecki was working on a big branch with custom
battlefields, which was never finished:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/robocode-developers/YtikqLGiEK0/YHT41Q5x37EJ
* Also ~2009, we had a "Robocode 2 Brainstorm" that might be of
interest to you: http://robowiki.net/wiki/Robocode_2_Brainstorm
* Virtual Combat (http://robowiki.net/wiki/Virtual_Combat) was a
one-off competition using CTF style gameplay with walls on the field.
A RoboWiki patron (KID) won first prize.
* Naval Robocode was recently released. Anybody tried it? Sounds
pretty neat. http://robo-code.blogspot.dk/2015/03/naval-robocode-092-has-been-released.html

I dunno... Robocode is awesome. It's natural to want more more more.
It's easy to fantasize about DrussGT 4.0 climbing hills and lobbing
grenades at hoardes of Phoenixes, while still ousting Diamond in
vanilla 1v1. But if gameplay changes had ever been made to Robocode,
I'm not convinced anyone would still be playing it. With a fixed rule
set and an ever growing archive of bots, bot authors have continued to
innovate way past a thousand cries of "nothing left to innovate".
We've had bullet shadows and bullet shielding integrated into the top
bots in the last few years. And we now have 1,100 bots in RoboRumble
General 1v1. Insane!

If you ask me, kids these days don't want a clunky Java desktop app.
Or a desktop app at all. They want their code on the web. They want
Javascript. They want to write in any language. They want to not even
think about it. They want sleek web UIs and to send replays to their
friends when their new version kicks butt. FightCodeGame did a lot of
things right in this regard, IMO.

Sorry to rant, but you caught me in the mood. :-)

PS - Putting gameplay changes aside, Robocode has been expanded in a
number of ways since ~2005 when Fnl took over. Fnl and Pavel have
updated Robocode with tons of awesome stuff. Bug fixes, UI
enhancements, RoboRumble integration, graphical debugging, .NET
robots, Java 7. Quite a long list! If you tried Robocode 1.07 (before
Fnl) now, you'd probably laugh.
Thanks for the update Patrick,
As a new person to Robocode it is apparent that there isn't a lot of active
community left, except for this google group, which is a shame.
For me Robocode gives an opportunity to improve my Java programming in a fun
and interesting way. It would be more enjoyable if we did have a more active
community(robowiki/google groups) with access to bots (robocoderepository),
but I can understand why since innovation reached its peak in the early
2000's. What I don't understand is why the game itself wasn't expanded.
You could do a lot to alter the game but still keep the feel. Incorporate
3D, varried terrain heights, obstacles, secondary weapon types. There is a
lot that could be added.
Anyway, my $0.02. I still enjoy working away on my robot, even if it will
never be a perfect wavesurfer
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns" the
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the "Google
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from IBM, it
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully web
based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the only truly
inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Patrick Cupka, ***@gmail.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
fnl
2015-07-20 09:47:11 UTC
Permalink
Hi Patrick,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)

It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or similar
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on SourceForge?
It should be enabled first. Currently the developer pages on SourceForge
are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So I am not able to
see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export (yet).

At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to make good
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down. But I
fully understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved
with the RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere
where more people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for
hosting etc.

When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running again, I
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get time
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to export
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.

Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the current
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features, they
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the integration etc.
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the one doing
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will have
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)

- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on top of
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also work for
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I don't
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least the
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I want to
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at anytime
without being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new
version as "my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other
people in.

Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns"
the wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the
"Google Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from
IBM, it smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the
only truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Peter Strm
2015-07-20 12:03:38 UTC
Permalink
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those advocating
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I do not
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to Patrick's.

I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even though the
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can relate to
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with DrussGT and
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick in the
book...

Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be
exported to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML
site is an alternative:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line

Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of where
it is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.

/PEZ
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or similar
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer pages on
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So I am
not able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export (yet).
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to make good
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down. But I
fully understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved
with the RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere
where more people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for
hosting etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running again, I
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get time
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to export
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the current
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features, they
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the integration etc.
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the one doing
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will have
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on top of
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also work for
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I don't
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least the
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I want to
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at anytime
without being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new
version as "my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other
people in.
Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns"
the wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the
"Google Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from
IBM, it smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the
only truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide
some other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how
would one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
David P. Caldwell
2015-07-20 13:06:56 UTC
Permalink
One other thing that is somewhat related: RobocodeRepository, which
contains a large database of the historic bots (opponents!), goes down
a great deal as well. Ideally that content could also be migrated to a
reliable hosting platform (I assume they could just be downloads from
wherever the source code is hosted, for example), which would help
preserve some of that historical value. And the historical value is
one of the greatest assets that provides the potential for future
growth, in my view.

-- David P. Caldwell
http://www.davidpcaldwell.com/
Post by Peter Strm
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those advocating
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I do not
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to Patrick's.
I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even though the
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can relate to
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with DrussGT and
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick in the
book...
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of where it
is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.
/PEZ
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or similar
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer pages on
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So I am not
able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export (yet).
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to make good
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down. But I fully
understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved with the
RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere where more
people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for hosting
etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running again, I
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get time
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to export
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the current
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features, they
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the integration etc.
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the one doing
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will have
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on top of
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also work for
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I don't
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least the
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I want to
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at anytime without
being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new version as
"my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other people in.
Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns" the
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the "Google
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from IBM, it
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the only
truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
fnl
2015-07-21 18:02:11 UTC
Permalink
Hi David,

You are right about the Robocode Repository.
However, I don't know how this could be moved. I could ask Dan Lynn
(owner/developer/admin of Robocode Repository) if it could be migrated to
another server.
It should be possible, but I don't expect it to be easy.

Cheers,
-- Flemming
Post by David P. Caldwell
One other thing that is somewhat related: RobocodeRepository, which
contains a large database of the historic bots (opponents!), goes down
a great deal as well. Ideally that content could also be migrated to a
reliable hosting platform (I assume they could just be downloads from
wherever the source code is hosted, for example), which would help
preserve some of that historical value. And the historical value is
one of the greatest assets that provides the potential for future
growth, in my view.
-- David P. Caldwell
http://www.davidpcaldwell.com/
Post by Peter Strm
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those
advocating
Post by Peter Strm
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I do
not
Post by Peter Strm
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to Patrick's.
I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even though
the
Post by Peter Strm
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can relate
to
Post by Peter Strm
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with DrussGT
and
Post by Peter Strm
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick in the
book...
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too
much
Post by Peter Strm
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be
exported
Post by Peter Strm
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is
an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Post by Peter Strm
Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of
where it
Post by Peter Strm
is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.
/PEZ
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or
similar
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer pages
on
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So I
am not
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export (yet).
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to make
good
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down. But I
fully
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved
with the
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere where
more
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for
hosting
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running again,
I
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get
time
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to
export
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the
current
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features, they
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the integration
etc.
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the one
doing
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will have
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on top
of
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also work
for
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I
don't
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least the
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I want
to
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at anytime
without
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new
version as
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
"my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other people in.
Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who
"owns" the
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in
it,
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg,
someone's
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in.
Then
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of
thing
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But
we
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to
someone
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions.
Then
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated
in
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the
"Google
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from IBM,
it
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games
can
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can
read a
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features
programmable
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon
(grenade-like).
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in
multithreading,
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5
replays of
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you
can
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the
only
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But
the
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than
it
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our
bots. ;)
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode
2"
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the
genre.
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done
though
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide
some
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how
would
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm
looking
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against
others..
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize
and
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting
?
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Post by i***@gmail.com
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
the
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Post by Peter Strm
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
Post by Peter Strm
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
David P. Caldwell
2015-07-22 10:41:54 UTC
Permalink
If we had a ZIP file of all the bots, we could just manually upload
them to SourceForge or whatever and change the URLs in the Rumble to
point to SourceForge.

Although a little tedious, this seems easy to me. Is there something
I'm missing?

-- David.
Post by fnl
Hi David,
You are right about the Robocode Repository.
However, I don't know how this could be moved. I could ask Dan Lynn
(owner/developer/admin of Robocode Repository) if it could be migrated to
another server.
It should be possible, but I don't expect it to be easy.
Cheers,
-- Flemming
Post by David P. Caldwell
One other thing that is somewhat related: RobocodeRepository, which
contains a large database of the historic bots (opponents!), goes down
a great deal as well. Ideally that content could also be migrated to a
reliable hosting platform (I assume they could just be downloads from
wherever the source code is hosted, for example), which would help
preserve some of that historical value. And the historical value is
one of the greatest assets that provides the potential for future
growth, in my view.
-- David P. Caldwell
http://www.davidpcaldwell.com/
Post by Peter Strm
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those advocating
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I do not
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to Patrick's.
I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even though the
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can relate to
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with DrussGT and
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick in the
book...
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of where it
is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.
/PEZ
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or similar
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer pages on
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So I am not
able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export (yet).
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to make good
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down. But I fully
understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved with the
RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere where more
people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for hosting
etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running again, I
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get time
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to export
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the current
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features, they
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the integration etc.
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the one doing
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will have
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on top of
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also work for
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I don't
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least the
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I want to
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at anytime without
being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new version as
"my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other people in.
Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns" the
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the "Google
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from IBM, it
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in
multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the only
truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
David Alves
2015-07-22 13:53:11 UTC
Permalink
I don't really trust sourceforge at this point :( Maybe github?
Post by David P. Caldwell
If we had a ZIP file of all the bots, we could just manually upload
them to SourceForge or whatever and change the URLs in the Rumble to
point to SourceForge.
Although a little tedious, this seems easy to me. Is there something
I'm missing?
-- David.
Post by fnl
Hi David,
You are right about the Robocode Repository.
However, I don't know how this could be moved. I could ask Dan Lynn
(owner/developer/admin of Robocode Repository) if it could be migrated to
another server.
It should be possible, but I don't expect it to be easy.
Cheers,
-- Flemming
Post by David P. Caldwell
One other thing that is somewhat related: RobocodeRepository, which
contains a large database of the historic bots (opponents!), goes down
a great deal as well. Ideally that content could also be migrated to a
reliable hosting platform (I assume they could just be downloads from
wherever the source code is hosted, for example), which would help
preserve some of that historical value. And the historical value is
one of the greatest assets that provides the potential for future
growth, in my view.
-- David P. Caldwell
http://www.davidpcaldwell.com/
Post by Peter Strm
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those advocating
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I do not
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to Patrick's.
I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even
though
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
the
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can relate to
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with
DrussGT
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
and
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick in
the
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
book...
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of where it
is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.
/PEZ
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or similar
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer
pages
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
on
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So I am not
able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export (yet).
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to make good
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down. But
I
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
fully
understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved with the
RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere where more
people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for hosting
etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running
again,
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
I
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get time
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to export
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the current
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features,
they
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the integration etc.
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the one doing
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will
have
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on top of
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also
work
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
for
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I don't
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least
the
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I
want
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
to
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at anytime without
being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new version as
"my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other people
in.
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
Hey guys - late to the dialogue, but a few things to mention.
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is
pretty
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns" the
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for
hosting,
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not
in
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-)
But
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it
single
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing
Robocode
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be
innovated
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the "Google
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from
IBM,
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
it
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can
read
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it
in a
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features
programmable
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in
multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if
you
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a
fully
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be
the
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
only
truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active
than
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even
"Robocode
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone
provide
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also,
how
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better,
widely
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Pavel Å avara <
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the
hosting
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Post by i***@gmail.com
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe
.
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
Post by fnl
Post by David P. Caldwell
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Pavel Šavara
2015-07-22 13:59:02 UTC
Permalink
Same here, do not trust SF anymore either.
GitHub would be great, but I think they don't have mediaWiki.
Converting wiki format is not much fun ...
​
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
David P. Caldwell
2015-07-22 13:59:22 UTC
Permalink
Right, well, to me it would make sense to put them where the code is.
Is the main site now GitHub? In that case, alas, GitHub doesn't
exactly do that; see https://github.com/blog/1302-goodbye-uploads. I
know Bitbucket does this, for example, and the linked article says
there's something called a "Release," but I assume this concept can't
really be shoehorned into that.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Patrick Cupka
2015-07-21 20:22:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Strm
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Ditching the current MediaWiki altogether seems a bit drastic. How
many instances of down-time have there been in the last couple years?
There was a big outage over the holidays in 2013 and then this one in
May. I doubt migrating the pages to a free host would work to
anybody's satisfaction. We couldn't migrate users, we have custom
MediaWiki plugins, even one that communicates with the LiteRumble
server. The RoboWiki is pretty huge and gets quite a bit of traffic.
The wiki would be a shadow of its former, uh, self. And who knows if
the reliability would improve, anyway.

Our current setup is pretty good. I use VPSLink for my BerryBots, too.
We just don't have any admins that still have the passion for
Robocode. When there is down-time, there is still the Wayback Machine
(at archive.org). If we can also offer a dump of the RoboWiki pages as
a big download, I'd be pretty satisfied with that setup.

When my passion started to fade, I made sure to give admin (MediaWiki
and SSH) access to some trustworthy folks that were still active:
Skilgannon, Rednaxela, and Darkcanuck. But I guess their passion has
faded too. (That's the same access that I have. David has that + the
admin console at VPSLink, for "hard" reboots.) Maybe someone like
Chase would be willing to step up with server admin responsibilities?
I certainly trust him and he knows his way around the wiki.
Post by Peter Strm
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those advocating
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I do not
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to Patrick's.
I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even though the
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can relate to
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with DrussGT and
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick in the
book...
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of where it
is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.
/PEZ
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or similar
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer pages on
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So I am not
able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export (yet).
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to make good
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down. But I fully
understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved with the
RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere where more
people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for hosting
etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running again, I
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get time
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to export
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the current
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features, they
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the integration etc.
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the one doing
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will have
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on top of
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also work for
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I don't
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least the
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I want to
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at anytime without
being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new version as
"my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other people in.
Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns" the
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the "Google
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from IBM, it
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the only
truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Patrick Cupka, ***@gmail.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
fnl
2015-07-23 19:26:56 UTC
Permalink
Hi Patrick,

If it is possible to keep the RoboWiki up and running with the help of
other user stepping up with admin responsibilities as you propose, this
would of course be the best option. :-)
Would that be sufficient for keeping the RoboWiki up and running?

- Flemming
Post by Peter Strm
Post by Peter Strm
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too
much
Post by Peter Strm
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be
exported
Post by Peter Strm
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is
an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Ditching the current MediaWiki altogether seems a bit drastic. How
many instances of down-time have there been in the last couple years?
There was a big outage over the holidays in 2013 and then this one in
May. I doubt migrating the pages to a free host would work to
anybody's satisfaction. We couldn't migrate users, we have custom
MediaWiki plugins, even one that communicates with the LiteRumble
server. The RoboWiki is pretty huge and gets quite a bit of traffic.
The wiki would be a shadow of its former, uh, self. And who knows if
the reliability would improve, anyway.
Our current setup is pretty good. I use VPSLink for my BerryBots, too.
We just don't have any admins that still have the passion for
Robocode. When there is down-time, there is still the Wayback Machine
(at archive.org). If we can also offer a dump of the RoboWiki pages as
a big download, I'd be pretty satisfied with that setup.
When my passion started to fade, I made sure to give admin (MediaWiki
Skilgannon, Rednaxela, and Darkcanuck. But I guess their passion has
faded too. (That's the same access that I have. David has that + the
admin console at VPSLink, for "hard" reboots.) Maybe someone like
Chase would be willing to step up with server admin responsibilities?
I certainly trust him and he knows his way around the wiki.
Post by Peter Strm
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those
advocating
Post by Peter Strm
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I do
not
Post by Peter Strm
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to Patrick's.
I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even though
the
Post by Peter Strm
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can relate
to
Post by Peter Strm
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with DrussGT
and
Post by Peter Strm
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick in the
book...
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too
much
Post by Peter Strm
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be
exported
Post by Peter Strm
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is
an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Post by Peter Strm
Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of
where it
Post by Peter Strm
is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.
/PEZ
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or
similar
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer pages
on
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So I
am not
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export (yet).
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to make
good
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down. But I
fully
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved
with the
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere where
more
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for
hosting
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running again,
I
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get
time
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to
export
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the
current
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features, they
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the integration
etc.
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the one
doing
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will have
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on top
of
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also work
for
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I
don't
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least the
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I want
to
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at anytime
without
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new
version as
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
"my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other people in.
Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who
"owns" the
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in
it,
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg,
someone's
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in.
Then
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of
thing
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But
we
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to
someone
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions.
Then
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated
in
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the
"Google
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from IBM,
it
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games
can
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can
read a
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features
programmable
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon
(grenade-like).
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in
multithreading,
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5
replays of
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you
can
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the
only
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But
the
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than
it
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our
bots. ;)
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode
2"
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the
genre.
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done
though
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide
some
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how
would
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm
looking
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against
others..
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize
and
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting
?
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Post by i***@gmail.com
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
the
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Patrick Cupka
2015-07-26 22:42:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
If it is possible to keep the RoboWiki up and running with the help of other
user stepping up with admin responsibilities as you propose, this would of
course be the best option. :-)
Would that be sufficient for keeping the RoboWiki up and running?
It won't hurt. :-) I guess we can wait and see if/when there is
another big outage before doing anything drastic. But I do think a new
admin that's both seasoned (trustworthy / knowledgeable) and active
(available) would be helpful. It's pretty much me and Skilgannon and
we both have plenty of other stuff going on. (Heck, I even have a
competing game.)

As for bots, Rednaxela has a pretty sweet automated bot archiving
system which saves them here:
http://robocode-archive.strangeautomata.com/robots/
Post by fnl
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Ditching the current MediaWiki altogether seems a bit drastic. How
many instances of down-time have there been in the last couple years?
There was a big outage over the holidays in 2013 and then this one in
May. I doubt migrating the pages to a free host would work to
anybody's satisfaction. We couldn't migrate users, we have custom
MediaWiki plugins, even one that communicates with the LiteRumble
server. The RoboWiki is pretty huge and gets quite a bit of traffic.
The wiki would be a shadow of its former, uh, self. And who knows if
the reliability would improve, anyway.
Our current setup is pretty good. I use VPSLink for my BerryBots, too.
We just don't have any admins that still have the passion for
Robocode. When there is down-time, there is still the Wayback Machine
(at archive.org). If we can also offer a dump of the RoboWiki pages as
a big download, I'd be pretty satisfied with that setup.
When my passion started to fade, I made sure to give admin (MediaWiki
Skilgannon, Rednaxela, and Darkcanuck. But I guess their passion has
faded too. (That's the same access that I have. David has that + the
admin console at VPSLink, for "hard" reboots.) Maybe someone like
Chase would be willing to step up with server admin responsibilities?
I certainly trust him and he knows his way around the wiki.
Post by Peter Strm
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those advocating
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I do not
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to Patrick's.
I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even though the
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can relate to
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with DrussGT and
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick in the
book...
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of where it
is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.
/PEZ
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or similar
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer pages on
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So I am not
able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export (yet).
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to make good
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down. But I fully
understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved with the
RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere where more
people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for hosting
etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running again, I
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get time
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to export
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the current
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features, they
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the integration etc.
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the one doing
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will have
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on top of
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also work for
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I don't
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least the
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I want to
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at anytime without
being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new version as
"my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other people in.
Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns" the
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the "Google
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from IBM, it
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in
multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the only
truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
--
Patrick Cupka, ***@gmail.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Patrick Cupka
2015-07-26 22:52:11 UTC
Permalink
On a more positive note, I just got the archived rankings and
@roborumble Twitter account working again:

http://robowiki.net/wiki/Category:Archived_Rankings
https://twitter.com/roborumble

Missed ~20 months of RoboRumble activity. Maybe I/we can get these
running on the server instead of my laptop while we are doing
housekeeping here...
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
If it is possible to keep the RoboWiki up and running with the help of other
user stepping up with admin responsibilities as you propose, this would of
course be the best option. :-)
Would that be sufficient for keeping the RoboWiki up and running?
It won't hurt. :-) I guess we can wait and see if/when there is
another big outage before doing anything drastic. But I do think a new
admin that's both seasoned (trustworthy / knowledgeable) and active
(available) would be helpful. It's pretty much me and Skilgannon and
we both have plenty of other stuff going on. (Heck, I even have a
competing game.)
As for bots, Rednaxela has a pretty sweet automated bot archiving
http://robocode-archive.strangeautomata.com/robots/
Post by fnl
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Ditching the current MediaWiki altogether seems a bit drastic. How
many instances of down-time have there been in the last couple years?
There was a big outage over the holidays in 2013 and then this one in
May. I doubt migrating the pages to a free host would work to
anybody's satisfaction. We couldn't migrate users, we have custom
MediaWiki plugins, even one that communicates with the LiteRumble
server. The RoboWiki is pretty huge and gets quite a bit of traffic.
The wiki would be a shadow of its former, uh, self. And who knows if
the reliability would improve, anyway.
Our current setup is pretty good. I use VPSLink for my BerryBots, too.
We just don't have any admins that still have the passion for
Robocode. When there is down-time, there is still the Wayback Machine
(at archive.org). If we can also offer a dump of the RoboWiki pages as
a big download, I'd be pretty satisfied with that setup.
When my passion started to fade, I made sure to give admin (MediaWiki
Skilgannon, Rednaxela, and Darkcanuck. But I guess their passion has
faded too. (That's the same access that I have. David has that + the
admin console at VPSLink, for "hard" reboots.) Maybe someone like
Chase would be willing to step up with server admin responsibilities?
I certainly trust him and he knows his way around the wiki.
Post by Peter Strm
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those advocating
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I do not
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to Patrick's.
I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even though the
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can relate to
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with DrussGT and
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick in the
book...
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit too much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site is an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of where it
is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.
/PEZ
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or similar
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer pages on
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So I am not
able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export (yet).
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to make good
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down. But I fully
understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved with the
RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere where more
people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for hosting
etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running again, I
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get time
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to export
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the current
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features, they
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the integration etc.
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the one doing
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will have
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on top of
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also work for
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I don't
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least the
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I want to
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at anytime without
being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new version as
"my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other people in.
Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns" the
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the "Google
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from IBM, it
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in
multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the only
truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
--
--
--
Patrick Cupka, ***@gmail.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
bum fod
2016-07-29 06:14:12 UTC
Permalink
Robowiki has down for several days, anyone knows what happened?
Post by Patrick Cupka
On a more positive note, I just got the archived rankings and
http://robowiki.net/wiki/Category:Archived_Rankings
https://twitter.com/roborumble
Missed ~20 months of RoboRumble activity. Maybe I/we can get these
running on the server instead of my laptop while we are doing
housekeeping here...
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
If it is possible to keep the RoboWiki up and running with the help of
other
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
user stepping up with admin responsibilities as you propose, this would
of
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
course be the best option. :-)
Would that be sufficient for keeping the RoboWiki up and running?
It won't hurt. :-) I guess we can wait and see if/when there is
another big outage before doing anything drastic. But I do think a new
admin that's both seasoned (trustworthy / knowledgeable) and active
(available) would be helpful. It's pretty much me and Skilgannon and
we both have plenty of other stuff going on. (Heck, I even have a
competing game.)
As for bots, Rednaxela has a pretty sweet automated bot archiving
http://robocode-archive.strangeautomata.com/robots/
Post by fnl
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit
too
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site
is
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Ditching the current MediaWiki altogether seems a bit drastic. How
many instances of down-time have there been in the last couple years?
There was a big outage over the holidays in 2013 and then this one in
May. I doubt migrating the pages to a free host would work to
anybody's satisfaction. We couldn't migrate users, we have custom
MediaWiki plugins, even one that communicates with the LiteRumble
server. The RoboWiki is pretty huge and gets quite a bit of traffic.
The wiki would be a shadow of its former, uh, self. And who knows if
the reliability would improve, anyway.
Our current setup is pretty good. I use VPSLink for my BerryBots, too.
We just don't have any admins that still have the passion for
Robocode. When there is down-time, there is still the Wayback Machine
(at archive.org). If we can also offer a dump of the RoboWiki pages
as
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
a big download, I'd be pretty satisfied with that setup.
When my passion started to fade, I made sure to give admin (MediaWiki
Skilgannon, Rednaxela, and Darkcanuck. But I guess their passion has
faded too. (That's the same access that I have. David has that + the
admin console at VPSLink, for "hard" reboots.) Maybe someone like
Chase would be willing to step up with server admin responsibilities?
I certainly trust him and he knows his way around the wiki.
Post by Peter Strm
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those advocating
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I
do
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
not
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to
Patrick's.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even
though
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
the
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can
relate
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
to
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with
DrussGT
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
and
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick in
the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
book...
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit
too
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site
is
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of where it
is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.
/PEZ
<javascript:>>
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or similar
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer
pages
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
on
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown). So
I
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
am not
able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export
(yet).
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to
make
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
good
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down.
But I
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
fully
understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be involved with the
RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere where more
people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for hosting
etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running
again,
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
I
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki somehow.
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I get time
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible to export
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the current
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features,
they
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the
integration
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
etc.
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the
one
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
doing
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will
have
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on
top
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
of
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also
work
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
for
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I don't
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over the
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least
the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I
want
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
to
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at
anytime
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
without
being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new version as
"my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other people
in.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Best regards,
- Flemming
Den lÞrdag den 18. juli 2015 kl. 20.04.23 UTC+2 skrev Patrick
Hey guys - late to the dialogue, but a few things to mention.
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is
pretty
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who
"owns" the
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for
hosting,
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's
not in
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an
XML
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested
in.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-)
But
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it
single
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki
to
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing
Robocode
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the
same
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active
competitions.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be
innovated
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's
the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
"Google
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from
IBM,
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
it
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other
games
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can
read
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it
in a
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features
programmable
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if
you
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a
fully
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be
the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
only
truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check
out
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community.
But
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active
than
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even
"Robocode
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into
the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone
provide
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also,
how
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better,
widely
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise.
I'm
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete
against
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
<javascript:>>
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki
is
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would
organize
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the
hosting
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many
people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Post by i***@gmail.com
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it,
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Post by i***@gmail.com
send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it,
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic
in
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
to
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Patrick Cupka
2016-07-30 15:52:43 UTC
Permalink
I just gave it a kick and seems to be up and working again. Enjoy!
Post by bum fod
Robowiki has down for several days, anyone knows what happened?
Post by Patrick Cupka
On a more positive note, I just got the archived rankings and
http://robowiki.net/wiki/Category:Archived_Rankings
https://twitter.com/roborumble
Missed ~20 months of RoboRumble activity. Maybe I/we can get these
running on the server instead of my laptop while we are doing
housekeeping here...
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
If it is possible to keep the RoboWiki up and running with the help of
other
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
user stepping up with admin responsibilities as you propose, this
would of
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
course be the best option. :-)
Would that be sufficient for keeping the RoboWiki up and running?
It won't hurt. :-) I guess we can wait and see if/when there is
another big outage before doing anything drastic. But I do think a new
admin that's both seasoned (trustworthy / knowledgeable) and active
(available) would be helpful. It's pretty much me and Skilgannon and
we both have plenty of other stuff going on. (Heck, I even have a
competing game.)
As for bots, Rednaxela has a pretty sweet automated bot archiving
http://robocode-archive.strangeautomata.com/robots/
Post by fnl
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit
too
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site
is
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Ditching the current MediaWiki altogether seems a bit drastic. How
many instances of down-time have there been in the last couple years?
There was a big outage over the holidays in 2013 and then this one in
May. I doubt migrating the pages to a free host would work to
anybody's satisfaction. We couldn't migrate users, we have custom
MediaWiki plugins, even one that communicates with the LiteRumble
server. The RoboWiki is pretty huge and gets quite a bit of traffic.
The wiki would be a shadow of its former, uh, self. And who knows if
the reliability would improve, anyway.
Our current setup is pretty good. I use VPSLink for my BerryBots,
too.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
We just don't have any admins that still have the passion for
Robocode. When there is down-time, there is still the Wayback Machine
(at archive.org). If we can also offer a dump of the RoboWiki pages
as
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
a big download, I'd be pretty satisfied with that setup.
When my passion started to fade, I made sure to give admin (MediaWiki
Skilgannon, Rednaxela, and Darkcanuck. But I guess their passion has
faded too. (That's the same access that I have. David has that + the
admin console at VPSLink, for "hard" reboots.) Maybe someone like
Chase would be willing to step up with server admin responsibilities?
I certainly trust him and he knows his way around the wiki.
Post by Peter Strm
Very interesting mail thread! I know I used to be one of those advocating
Robocode game play should stay as clean and simple as it was, but I
do
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
not
remember ever thinking it through on a level even close to
Patrick's.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
I'm also sure there are still major innovations to be made, even
though
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
the
interest for the platform might fade before that happens. I can
relate
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
to
how discouraging it could be to go about trying to compete with
DrussGT
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
and
Diamond and realise you will have to perfect every existing trick
in the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
book...
Anyway, it seems that hosting a stable mediawiki instance is a bit
too
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
much
of a bother at current. Seems like a great idea to see if it can be exported
to SF. If that doesn't work, then just exporting a static HTML site
is
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
an
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Publishing_from_MediaWiki#Built-in_methods_of_exporting_data_via_the_command-line
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Regardless, when the export is done, let me know the hostname/IP of where it
is published so that I can repoint the DNS things.
/PEZ
Post by fnl
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
It would be great if we could move the RoboWiki to another Wiki or similar
(static pages?), e.g. using the Export feature of the MediaWiki
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Export).
Perhaps it could be moved to the Wiki for the Robocode page on
SourceForge? It should be enabled first. Currently the developer
pages
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
on
SourceForge are down (is being restored after a disk breakdown).
So I
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
am not
able to see, if it is possible to import the MediaWiki export
(yet).
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
At least I want to let people access all the vital knowledge to
make
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
good
Robocode robots. And people get upset when the RoboWiki is down.
But I
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
fully
understand that you (PEZ) and David Alves don't what to be
involved
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
with the
RoboWiki anymore. The best thing would be to put it somewhere
where
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
more
people is able to maintain it - and hopefully without to pay for hosting
etc.
When the developer pages of SourceForge (SF) are up and running
again,
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
I
will see if I can import the RoboWiki pages to the SF Wiki
somehow.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
I will also try to make an export of the RoboWiki pages, when I
get
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
time
for it (probably tonight). I expect that it will not be possible
to
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
export
the RoboWiki users. So this will be an issue.
Regarding the development of Robocode. I am only maintaining the current
Robocode with bug fixes etc. If somebody want to add new features,
they
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
should go ahead and implement these. I will help with the
integration
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
etc.
if the features are not too complex to handle. But I won't be the
one
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
doing
all the work (anymore).
Robocode is Open Source, so if somebody else want to take over the
development, they are free to do so. I just hope he/she/they will
have
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
skills enough to get it in a better shape. ;-)
- - - -
I am still working on a "Robocode 2", which is protocol based (on
top
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
of
WebSockets) making it possible to be language independent and also
work
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
for
web - e.g. using JavaScript. The development progress is slow as I don't
have so much spare time as I had 10 years ago (when taking over
the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
development/maintenance of Robocode).
I am not sure if I will ever finish this new version, but at least
the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
development is still ongoing. Currently it is not open source as I
want
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
to
make a clean core and have the freedom to change anything at
anytime
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
without
being forced to coordinate with other developers. I see this new version as
"my new baby", so it must be good enough before I let other people
in.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Best regards,
- Flemming
Den lÞrdag den 18. juli 2015 kl. 20.04.23 UTC+2 skrev Patrick
Hey guys - late to the dialogue, but a few things to mention.
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is
pretty
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who
"owns" the
wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for
hosting,
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's
not in
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an
XML
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested
in.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind
of
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-)
But
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it
single
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki
to
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing
Robocode
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the
same
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active
competitions.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be
innovated
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's
the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
"Google
Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from
IBM,
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
it
smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java,
name
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other
games
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well
as
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You
can read
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it
in a
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features
programmable
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon
(grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5
replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if
you
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a
fully
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be
the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
only
truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check
out
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community.
But
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active
than
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update
our
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even
"Robocode
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into
the
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone
provide
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also,
how
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better,
widely
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise.
I'm
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete
against
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Pavel Å avara <
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki
is
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would
organize
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the
hosting
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for
many
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Post by i***@gmail.com
people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Post by i***@gmail.com
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it,
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Post by i***@gmail.com
send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it,
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
Post by Pavel Å avara
send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic
in
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
to
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
Groups
"robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by fnl
Post by Patrick Cupka
Post by Peter Strm
Post by fnl
an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Patrick Cupka, ***@gmail.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
fnl
2015-07-21 18:12:48 UTC
Permalink
Hi again,

I have now checked out the Wiki available at the SourceForge site. It is
extremely simple and probably only useful as pages shared between the
developers of the project. It will not be possible to migrate RoboWiki into
this wiki. That is for sure.

I have had a look for a free wiki hosting service and have found Orain Wiki
<http://meta.orain.org/wiki/Main_Page> hosting. There are lots of other free
wiki hosting services
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_hosting_services> out
there. But Orain seems to have lots of benefits - even though it is free.
Perhaps it would be possible to export and import the RoboWiki to Orain.
This way the hosting will be free. However, there is no guarantee that
problems will occur with Orain. If you guys know of a better alternative,
then please speak up. :-)

We could also export the RoboWiki to static HTML pages. Then I could pay
for the web hosting and copy all the static HTML to this place?

What do you guys think is the best way to proceed?

Best regards,
- Flemming
Post by Patrick Cupka
wall of text incoming.)
The wiki mostly runs itself and is hosted at VPSLink, which is pretty
reliable. The problem during downtime is that neither myself, who "owns"
the wiki (i.e., from PEZ), nor David Alves, who actually pays for hosting,
actually care so much about Robocode anymore. When your heart's not in it,
there are plenty of other things that take precedence.
I believe MediaWiki has a facility to export all the pages to an XML
format. We could make the full archive available somewhere (eg, someone's
Dropbox) every so often, if it's something people are interested in. Then
you can do whatever you want with it. It strikes me as the kind of thing
people say they want, then nobody would actually download it. :-) But we
could try.
There's certainly nobody acting as a gatekeeper here to keep it single
sourced. There are no ads. PEZ and I gave a dump of the old wiki to someone
upon request a while back. The RoboWiki is all about sharing Robocode
knowledge.
There are plenty of other programming games, but nothing in the same
league as Robocode as far as number of bots or active competitions. Then
again, people also complain that there is nothing new to be innovated in
Robocode, so it's a double-edged sword. I like to joke that it's the
"Google Reader of programming games" – it got a huge corporate push from
IBM, it smothers the rest of the market (tons of bots, history, Java, name
recognition), and might need to die off before all these other games can
blossom - hopefully with some kind of common community, as well as
communities of their own.
I have my own offering: BerryBots (http://berrybots.com). You can read a
http://berrybots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17 ... Or even try it in a
browser: http://playberrybots.com. Primarily, it features programmable
stages, walls on the playing field, and a secondary weapon (grenade-like).
It also has a pretty sweet automation API with built-in multithreading,
(optional) graphical form inputs, and the ability to save HTML5 replays of
matches. There are only a few bots, but I'd be hella impressed if you can
beat Sanic (from Frohman).
The other games that have caught my eye are FightCodeGame.com, a fully
web based Robocode-inspired game; and NodeWar.com, which might be the
only truly inspiring / innovative gameplay I've seen. I'd also check out
http://programminggames.org, which seems to be gaining steam.
I sympathize with the desire to join a large, active community. But the
RoboWiki might make the Robocode community seem a lot more active than it
is. Good luck catching me and Skilgannon while we never update our bots. ;)
At some point, we have to make something new. I suspect even "Robocode 2"
will have the same problems as the rest of the new entrants into the genre.
Hope that's enlightening! Best of luck,
-- Patrick
Sent from mobile
I'll raise my hand. I just don't know what would need to be done though
since I've never done this before. Would a service such as
http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page suffice? Can anyone provide some
other guidance on a good way to host that is minimal cost? Also, how would
one obtain the current wiki content?
Question. Is robocode still viable or are there other better, widely
used, supported platforms along the same vein? Please advise. I'm looking
to work with a platform like robocode to ultimately compete against others..
Post by ramn.se ‘¸
How do we get hold of the database?
Post by Pavel Å avara
Hi everybody,
it would be perhaps good idea if all people who think robowiki is
important would try to help.
Somebody may try to run mirror, or perhaps somebody would organize and
run it on more stable hosting ?
Perhaps people would donate some cash needed to pay for the hosting ?
Just suggestions, in the end it's community project, right ?
Anybody at all ? Raise your hands !
Pavel
Post by i***@gmail.com
Yeah, I hope they fix it soon... It's really important for many people!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/robocode/E437YrPMZFw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robocode" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to robocode+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Loading...